Posts on Twitter:

Thank you to our 45 expert mentors from across the PVAW sector for sharing your wisdom and insights.

Retweet Retweeted Like Liked

Join me for a live podcast taping of Where We with James Cook from JLL retail. Be sure to grab a seat at the Innovation Exchange Stage! #2019

ONE week from today we’re tackling how to manage . Register for your spot to learn from the :

Al McMordie has released his 10* NHL GAME OF THE WEEK on tomorrow night's playoff game between San Jose and St. Louis!

A quick preview of 's Wednesday, July 24: - Paper Sessions - and - "Ask the " Session - Tutorials and Workshops - Week Session Check out the Advance Program now!

RT : ’s Department of Media Relations is excited to announce the launch of its brand-new Database! To view the database, click here: .

Learn from the . Such as Suzanne M. Hopgood, of , a Member of the Board of Directors, Chair Nominating/Governance Committee of and More! Waitlist:

Learn from the . Such as Suzanne M. Hopgood, of , a Member of the Board of Directors, Chair Nominating/Governance Committee of and More! Waitlist:

Need to update your insurance declared value figure? We can value one or an entire and are in the field

Yep... was a complete letdown.. But don't let that ruin your week! We have waiting for you to book 1-on-1 meetings with them.

If you or your company are planning on building an in-house team to deliver Data Vault 2.0 Then read the blog by in and here. We have some great tips

Join me for a live podcast taping of Where We Buy with James Cook from retail. Be sure to grab a seat at the Innovation Exchange Stage! #2019

Join me as I moderate a panel on How Retailers Are Using AI to Win. Learn more about how retailers spending on AI is projected to grow from $2B last year to $7.3B by 2022. #2019

Join our CEO and Founder Deborah Weinswig as she moderates a panel on How Retailers Are Using AI to Win. Learn more about how retailers spending on AI is projected to grow from $2B last year to $7.3B by 2022. #2019

Posts on Tumblr:

Predictions gone wrong: The peculiar blindness of experts

>The bet was on, and it was over the fate of humanity. On one side was the Stanford biologist Paul R. Ehrlich. In his 1968 best seller, The Population Bomb, Ehrlich insisted that it was too late to prevent a doomsday apocalypse resulting from overpopulation. Resource shortages would cause hundreds of millions of starvation deaths within a decade. It was cold, hard math: The human population was growing exponentially; the food supply was not. Ehrlich was an accomplished butterfly specialist. He knew that nature did not regulate animal populations delicately. Populations exploded, blowing past the available resources, and then crashed.

>In his book, Ehrlich played out hypothetical scenarios that represented “the kinds of disasters that will occur.” In the worst-case scenario, famine rages across the planet. Russia, China, and the United States are dragged into nuclear war, and the resulting environmental degradation soon extinguishes the human race. In the “cheerful” scenario, population controls begin. Famine spreads, and countries teeter, but the major death wave ends in the mid-1980s. Only half a billion or so people die of starvation. “I challenge you to create one more optimistic,” Ehrlich wrote, adding that he would not count scenarios involving benevolent aliens bearing care packages.The economist Julian Simon took up Ehrlich’s challenge. Technology—water-control techniques, hybridized seeds, management strategies—had revolutionized agriculture, and global crop yields were increasing. To Simon, more people meant more good ideas about how to achieve a sustainable future. So he proposed a wager. Ehrlich could choose five metals that he expected to become more expensive as resources were depleted and chaos ensued over the next decade. Both men agreed that commodity prices were a fine proxy for the effects of population growth, and they set the stakes at $1,000 worth of Ehrlich’s five metals. If, 10 years hence, prices had gone down, Ehrlich would have to pay the difference in value to Simon. If prices went up, Simon would be on the hook for the difference. The bet was made official in 1980.

>Ehrlich’s starvation predictions were almost comically bad. And yet, the very same year he conceded the bet, Ehrlich doubled down in another book, with another prediction that would prove untrue: Sure, his timeline had been a little off, he wrote, but “now the population bomb has detonated.” Despite one erroneous prediction after another, Ehrlich amassed an enormous following and received prestigious awards. Simon, meanwhile, became a standard-bearer for scholars who felt that Ehrlich had ignored economic principles. The kind of excessive regulations Ehrlich advocated, the Simon camp argued, would quell the very innovation that had delivered humanity from catastrophe. Both men became luminaries in their respective domains. Both were mistaken.

>The result: The experts were, by and large, horrific forecasters. Their areas of specialty, years of experience, and (for some) access to classified information made no difference. They were bad at short-term forecasting and bad at long-term forecasting. They were bad at forecasting in every domain. When experts declared that future events were impossible or nearly impossible, 15 percent of them occurred nonetheless. When they declared events to be a sure thing, more than one-quarter of them failed to transpire. As the Danish proverb warns, “It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.”

>Even faced with their results, many experts never admitted systematic flaws in their judgment. When they missed wildly, it was a near miss; if just one little thing had gone differently, they would have nailed it. “There is often a curiously inverse relationship,” Tetlock concluded, “between how well forecasters thought they were doing and how well they did.”Early predictions in Tetlock’s research pertained to the future of the Soviet Union. Some experts (usually liberals) saw Mikhail Gorbachev as an earnest reformer who would be able to change the Soviet Union and keep it intact for a while, and other experts (usually conservatives) felt that the Soviet Union was immune to reform and losing legitimacy. Both sides were partly right and partly wrong. Gorbachev did bring real reform, opening the Soviet Union to the world and empowering citizens. But those reforms unleashed pent-up forces in the republics outside Russia, where the system had lost legitimacy. The forces blew the Soviet Union apart. Both camps of experts were blindsided by the swift demise of the U.S.S.R.One subgroup of scholars, however, did manage to see more of what was coming. Unlike Ehrlich and Simon, they were not vested in a single discipline. They took from each argument and integrated apparently contradictory worldviews. They agreed that Gorbachev was a real reformer and that the Soviet Union had lost legitimacy outside Russia. A few of those integrators saw that the end of the Soviet Union was close at hand and that real reforms would be the catalyst.The integrators outperformed their colleagues in pretty much every way, but especially trounced them on long-term predictions. Eventually, Tetlock bestowed nicknames (borrowed from the philosopher Isaiah Berlin) on the experts he’d observed: The highly specialized hedgehogs knew “one big thing,” while the integrator foxes knew “many little things.”Hedgehogs are deeply and tightly focused. Some have spent their career studying one problem. Like Ehrlich and Simon, they fashion tidy theories of how the world works based on observations through the single lens of their specialty. Foxes, meanwhile, “draw from an eclectic array of traditions, and accept ambiguity and contradiction,” Tetlock wrote. Where hedgehogs represent narrowness, foxes embody breadth.Incredibly, the hedgehogs performed especially poorly on long-term predictions within their specialty. They got worse as they accumulated experience and credentials in their field. The more information they had to work with, the more easily they could fit any story into their worldview.

>In Tetlock’s 20-year study, both the broad foxes and the narrow hedgehogs were quick to let a successful prediction reinforce their beliefs. But when an outcome took them by surprise, foxes were much more likely to adjust their ideas. Hedgehogs barely budged. Some made authoritative predictions that turned out to be wildly wrong—then updated their theories in the wrong direction. They became even more convinced of the original beliefs that had led them astray. The best forecasters, by contrast, view their own ideas as hypotheses in need of testing. If they make a bet and lose, they embrace the logic of a loss just as they would the reinforcement of a win. This is called, in a word, learning.

Water damage restoration Chicago

Call NOW 855-480-62-93 if you have an emergency ( 24/7 ) or you just need water damage restoration in Chicago, Illinois.

From leaking faucets to burst pipes and flooding, flood damage is one of the most common and potentially destructive problems you can face as a homeowner. If not taken care of immediately, excess water in your home can promote electrical hazards, cause expensive damage to your home’s structure and furnishings, and can even lead to the growth of hazardous mold. 

When the worst happens, call our experts, in Chicago! 

When you are dealing with water damage, immediate action is crucial. Our Professionals respond immediately and use advanced equipment and techniques to remove the water quickly. They closely monitor and document the drying process to verify your property is dried properly and thoroughly.

- 24/7 Emergency Service

- Highly Trained Water Restoration Specialists

- Faster to Any Size Disaster

Water damage can happen  anytime. And either it is a kitchen pipe, a river flood or a hurricane you want to take care of it as fast as possible! Thus being the case, you need a water damage repair company servicing Chicago and surrounding area (Illinois). 

Call NOW 855-480-62-93 ! Let flood damage restoration experts help you!

Water damage restoration companies servicing Chicago and its suburbs: if you want  your own water damage restoration video here,  contact us at

 If you don’t have a water restoration service video , we can provide one, FOR FREE.

Best Tressed: Tips for Finishing & Setting Your Hair. Shine, Volume, Anti-Frizz, and Hold.


“Beautiful healthy hair has an undeniable gloss, bounce and lustre to it,” explains renowned celebrity and editorial hairstylist Raymond Robinson “whereas hair that needs some attention tends to look dull, a little puffy, lacks movement and bounce.” Prior to hot tool use, apply a heat protectant to seal the hair cuticle away from excess heat exposure. It’s also helpful to ensure your hot tools are adjusted to the coolest setting possible as to not overheat or potentially burn the hair. You can help to maintain damage-free hair by applying a conditioning product such as a nourishing serum to ends. This will discourage splitting and fraying and ensure your hair has a healthy finish with lustrous shine.

When it comes to boosting hair shine, Robinson argues that using a great quality hairdryer is key. “If you’re going for a smooth [look], keep the nozzle on as this adds double the shine in half of the time.” Go easy on shine sprays and solutions, too, as you don’t want to overwhelm the hair. We love: Keune Blend Gloss Spray , VS Sassoon Digital Sensor Hairdryer

TIP: When you’ve finished blow-drying your hair with heat, blast with cool air. This technique will help to retain volume, yet add a sleek, shiny finish to your tresses.

Keep reading


#custom #products . You want them we get them for you. Looking for #professional custom products? If #yes give me a #holler I #work #hard to make sure you are taken #care of #properly everytime.
#getonmylevel #boss #experts #team #tuesday #may (at Orange County, California)

Made with Instagram
The Peculiar Blindness of Experts
Credentialed authorities are comically bad at predicting the future. But reliable forecasting is possible.
By David Epstein

Forecasting is a ‘best guess’, even for the smartest people with the biggest computers.

But too often we are expecting that an expert’s ‘best guess’ is actually a viable best guess, when in fact they are a linear approximation based on that expert’s field of expertise.

This is where generalists and ‘jack of all trades’ come into play, and are absolutely necessary for leadership positions and politics in particular.


MiraculousCoraZone Needs Help!

Does anyone here know a lot about YouTube accounts? A YouTuber who goes by the name MiraculousCoraZone is having some problems signing into her account.  For some reason, she can’t sign into her youtube account, every time she attempts to sign in it signs her into a backup account with nothing on it, and she has no idea how to fix it.

If you have any idea how to fix it,